Thursday, June 01, 2006

Tamil Nadu now clears 69 percent reservation for backwards in private educational institutions

Tamil Nadu now clears 69 percent reservation for backwards in private educational institutions

Chennai: The stand-off between the Central Government and the medical community across the country over the reservation of seats for other backward classes may have whimpered out after 19 days, but this has not stopped the Tamil Nadu State Assembly from passing a Bill that now also grants 69 per cent reservation for weaker sections and backward classes in all private educational institutions andother establishments run by minorities.

A State Government notification said on Wednesday that the Bill's approval was done after "careful consideration of the population in the respective categories and the present stage of their advancement in education."

According to its provisions, backward classes will have 30 per cent reservation; most backward classes and denotified communities 20 per cent; Scheduled Castes 18 per cent and Scheduled Tribes one per cent.

Higher Education Minister K.Ponmudi said this decision had to be taken sooner than later.

The four South Indian States -- Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh as well as in Maharashtra and Gujarat have had varying degrees of experience as far as the issue of reservations is concerned. The opposition to reservation of seats in jobs and in education institutions has been marginal or absolutely nil. The overwhelming opinion among the people in these States, and even in "excellence-pursuing" academic circles, supports the principle and practice of reservation. The system seems to have got so embedded in the education sector in almost all these States, that the reaction is notably balanced.

The concept of reservation in education for historically oppressed sections of society took roots in South India over a century ago, along with the freedom movement. That a number of initiatives associated with the freedom struggle in this region had their lineage in the social reform movement against caste discrimination.

This concept was first advanced by Tamil Nadu, where the social and political assertion of OBCs and other deprived sections led to the creation of the powerful Dravidian movement. Reservation in education and public service began in the Madras Presidency (much of it is now in Tamil Nadu) as early as 1831. The British Raj initiated this in response to petitions from various public groups. Over the next few decades the provisions of reservation were progressively redefined and modified, correcting anomalies and rationalising affirmative action.

The process continued after Independence too and successive governments under the leadership of Dravidian parties such as the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) and the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) introduced "rationalising" classifications like "economic scale" and Most Backward Castes (MBCs). The sum total of these measures was that reservation in the educational institutions in Tamil Nadu rose to 69 per cent, a figure commensurate with the total population of S.C.s, S.T.s, OBCs and MBCs in the State.

Tamil Nadu had 69 per cent reservation even before the Mandal Commission recommendations, promoting 27 per cent reservation for OBCs, were introduced at the national level. In this context, the Supreme Court came up with a stipulation seeking to limit reservation in educational institutions to 50 per cent. This order was a result of efforts by a number of anti-reservation organisations and individuals trying to bring down the reservation quota in Tamil Nadu. But the cumulative initiatives taken by various governments led by the Dravidian parties successfully resisted these counter-moves. The net result of all this is that since 1994, Tamil Nadu's 69 per cent reservation has the sanction of being part of the Ninth Schedule of the Constitution and hence is beyond judicial scrutiny.

2 Comments:

At 2:31 AM, Blogger PRO RESERVATION FRONT said...

Education generates economic, it can be via versa but economic without education can not boost. Reservation will generate both education and economic.

Therefore Dalit Bahujan's total freedom from caste will depend on education and economic but it is long process. Education and economic are manupulated by upper caste.

Dalit Bahujn need short for attaining complete freedom from caste. Dalit Bahujan (honest) political can do justice for Dalit Bahujan samaj.

Tamil Nadu's new government's move is one example how Dalit Bahujan political can do.

 
At 11:26 PM, Blogger ASA said...

Coverage of reservation stir biased: Journalists Group

New Delhi, May 30 (UNI) Senior journalists, academicians and a senior doctor
from AIIMS have described the media coverage of the anti-reservation stir as
"one-sided and biased" with well-known psephologist Yogendra Yadav announcing
that his oganisation would survey the background of all mediapersons and judges
within two years and put their profiles on the website.

Participating in a seminar on "How Media Covered Reservation Stir" organised
by "Journalists for Democracy, Delhi" here on Saturday, Mr Yadav said the media
went off the mark in reporting the agitation but added that proponents of
reservation should also reconsider to what extent the caste-based OBC
reservation was an affirmative action in the Indian society. "Since the Mandal
Commission implementation in 1990s, things have undergone a sea change with
economic issues coming to the fore", he said.

Referring to his organisation - Centre for Study of Development Socieites
(CSDS) - plan to prepare a profile of working journalists and judges, Mr Yadav
said such an exercise had already been undertaken in the US and it was necessary
to know the conduct and performance of the persons concerned and their expected
contribution to the development of the society.

Dr Anoop Saraya, a Professor from AIIMS said the same venue - the park of the
premier hospital where employees and doctors were debarred by a court order from
staging a protest which is their legal right - now had been thrown open to the
anti-reservationists.

''These protesters have rather been facilitated by the hospital management and
egged upon by industrialists and a section of political class to raise their
bogey of protest with the print and electronic media hovering all around to
highlight them." On the other hand, the media had deliberately ignored the
pro-reservationists in the AIIMS from projecting their point of view, Dr Saraya
said adding that the media bias was more pronounced this time than that
witnessed during the anti-Mandal agitation during 1990s.

Well-known columnist Anil Chamdria supported Mr Yadav's views that a section
of electronic media deliberately projected the National Health and Family Survey
that the percentage of OBC population was only 29 per cent excluding OBC from
the Muslim community and not 52 per cent as given out by the Mandal Commission.

Mr Chamdria agreed with Mr Yadav's assertion that the Health and Family survey
had a limited purpose and could not be correct.

However, Mr Yadav maintained that the Mandal's figure of the OBC population
was disputed and according to his assessment, it could be around 42 per cent.

Most of the senior journalists including Mr G Chandrasekar from UNI, Mr Shambu
Nath Singh from Jagran and Mr Urmalesh from Hindi Hindustan argued that the
media 'sustained and projected the anti-reservation stir out of proportion and
completely blacked out the views and protests of the pro-reservation people who
constitute at least 80 per cent of the country's population.

Most of the speakers, including Mr S S Bechain, Professor of Journalism in a
Delhi University College and Mr Sidharath Verdhrajan, Delhi-based editor of 'The
Hindu,' said most of the working journalists covering the anti-reservation stir
"were ignorant about the recent 104th Constitutional Amendment in favour of 27
per cent reservation for OBC and which had been supported by all political
parties including the BJP".

Veteran journalist Masat Ram Kapoor said, ''the Indian media is dominated by
the upper caste people and none of the Dalits so far have become editor in any
mainstream media including the vernacular press....and the ongoing doctors'
agitation reflected the pride and self-centredness of the moneyed class with
middle calss trappings which does not want to lose any of its privileges."

However, Mr Parshotam Aggrawal, a professor from JNU wondered how media could
go to the extent of ignoring version of the other side while reporting an
incident.

The participants viewed that with economic liberalisation and with private
trade owning the electronic media, news was being projected as a 'saleable
commodity' meant to generate maximum advertisement revenue for the
establishment. "And, the reporters on the spot have ceased to exist in the game
of business and enhancing TRP rating," they added.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home